On Sat, 08 Apr 2006 20:52:48 GMT, "Take The Chip*"
Post by Take The Chip*Post by MeOn Sat, 08 Apr 2006 19:35:03 GMT, "Take The Chip*"
Post by Take The Chip*Post by MeOn 7 Apr 2006 21:32:18 -0700, "PartyPoker Affiliate"
Post by PartyPoker Affiliatehttp://911nightmare.blogspot.com/
How is it that I haven't even BEEN there yet and I already know it's a
kook conspiracy site?
That is because you're a complete idiot that THINKS you know things when in
reality, your head is so far up your ass, you don't know which was is up.
You're the kind of moron that believes every word you hear from mainstream
media sources and questions nothing. You have no capacity for independant
thought.
We've all seen the video of what actually happened.
There you go again proving you're an idiot by making baseless assumptions.
"We've all seen the video"? What video, you chromosome deficient cretin?
There are MANY VIDEOS that each provide evidence that your government is
lying to you.
Post by MeThat was in NO way a controlled
demolition.
ROFL! Building #7 wasn't even hit by a plane you moron. And jet fuel, which
even if it didn't burn up immediately.....which it did.....would not be able
to come close to burning the FIRE RETARDANT STEEL that building #7 was built
from.
You flaming kook... I've seen the numbers run on that and that kook
theory has been completely debunked. The steel should have held the
temps generated darn near to the minute as long as it actually DID.
It's amazing really that the engineering was actually that GOOD.
Post by Take The Chip*It came down at near free-fall speeds that could ONLY be brought about
by a controlled demolition.
Once it started pancaking it fell just as it should have been expected
to fall when pancaking.
Post by Take The Chip*The molten steel that was found at the base of
the building could only be created by high termperature producing explosives
such as c4. The shockwaves recorded by seismographs at Columbia University's
Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory in Palisades also verified that explosives
were used.
B.S. You want to tell me that the comparatively SMALL amount of
explosives that would have been required to shatter the requisite
support structures made a notable seismographic impression? That's
absurd. MILLIONS of TONS of concrete and steel pancaking would have
certainly been detectable though.
Post by Take The Chip*Any of this evidence on it's own is enough proof. All of it
together makes any shred of doubt impossible.
All any of this kookery explains is that there are a few people in
this world that medication and a constructive hobby.
Post by Take The Chip*The "official" story is so absurd, it is laughable to anyone with an IQ
above 80. You want so desperately to believe that your government is acting
in the best interest of the american people that you'll believe anything!
You want so desperately to believe that the government THAT I ELECTED
is acting with evil intent that you'll try to read the absurd into
anything and/or make up anything and believe that!
Bush is about as evil as your grandmother. All he wants is for you to
get off your lazy socialistic butt and stop dragging society into the
toilet, as socialist ALWAYS do. Deal with the reality of your own
sorriness and stop with the kookery already.